New: FY 2025-26 compliance calendar is live — view it here

TDS on Professional Fees Paid to an NRI

Professional fees paid to an NRI follow the non-resident Section 393(2) framework, not the resident professional-services code (1027) — a distinction frequently missed.

FY 2026-27 · Section 393(2)

Quick answer

Indicative rate

20% (as FTS) or per specific category

Section & code

Section 393(2), Sl. No. 17, Code 1057

Forms typically needed:

Form 15CA Form 15CB

Cross-Border TDS Decision Helper

Payee has valid PAN?
TRC + Form 41 furnished?

Indicative Act rate

20%

Domestic Act rate under Section 393(2) for royalty/FTS to a non-resident non-company — doubled from 10% by Finance Act 2023 (effective 1 April 2023), unchanged since. Classify carefully: royalty and FTS have different treaty definitions.

Without a TRC and Form 41, the treaty rate can't be applied — the Act rate above governs until documentation is furnished.

This is a decision aid, not a filing determination — always confirm classification and the exact treaty article with a professional before remitting.

The mistake this page exists to prevent

A common, genuinely costly error: applying the resident professional-services rate (10% under Code 1027, formerly Section 194J(b)) to a payment made to an NRI professional. Code 1027 applies specifically to resident payees — the moment the payee is a non-resident, the entire framework shifts to Section 393(2), with a different rate (typically 20% as FTS, not 10%), different documentation requirements, and no threshold instead of the ₹50,000 threshold that applies under Code 1027.

This mistake tends to happen precisely because a professional fee for legal, medical, or accountancy services looks identical on paper to a domestic professional-fee invoice — the trigger for the different treatment is purely the payee's residential status, which isn't always obvious from the invoice alone if the professional has an Indian-sounding name or an Indian bank account.

Why professional fees to NRIs are usually FTS, not a separate category

Unlike the resident framework, which has a dedicated professional-services code, Section 393(2) doesn't have an equivalent standalone 'professional fees' category — a payment for legal, medical, architectural, or accountancy services rendered by an NRI is generally classified as Fees for Technical Services under the general non-resident framework, attracting the 20% domestic rate rather than a specific professional-services rate.

Confirming residential status before applying any rate

Before determining the applicable code and rate, confirm the professional's residential status for the relevant financial year — an Indian citizen living abroad, a foreign national providing services from outside India, and a person who's spent enough days in India to qualify as resident despite holding a foreign address are all different fact patterns with different tax treatment. A foreign bank account or overseas address is a strong indicator but not conclusive proof of non-resident status on its own.

Practical checklist before processing the payment

  • Confirm the professional's residential status for the current financial year, not just their citizenship or address.
  • If non-resident, apply Section 393(2)/FTS classification, not the resident Code 1027 rate.
  • Request TRC and Form 10F if a DTAA benefit will be claimed.
  • File Form 15CA, and Form 15CB if the ₹5 lakh aggregate threshold is crossed.

Worked example

A ₹3 lakh legal consultation fee paid to an Indian-origin lawyer now resident in Canada

An Indian company pays ₹3,00,000 to a lawyer of Indian origin, now a Canadian tax resident, for legal advisory work. Despite the Indian-sounding name and prior India connection, the lawyer is non-resident for the relevant year. This is FTS under Section 393(2), not Code 1027 — 20% TDS (₹60,000) applies domestically, absent DTAA documentation, with Form 15CA required (Form 15CB not mandatory below the ₹5 lakh aggregate threshold, though best practice is to obtain one for any cross-border payment with genuine classification complexity).

Common mistakes & litigation traps

Applying the resident 10% rate to a non-resident professional

The single most common error in this category — always confirm residential status before assuming the domestic resident professional-fee rate applies.

Assuming an Indian name or Indian bank account means resident status

Neither is conclusive — residential status depends on the actual days-in-India test for the relevant financial year, not identity markers.

Missing the no-threshold rule for non-resident payments

Unlike Code 1027's ₹50,000 threshold, Section 393(2) has no threshold — even a small professional fee to a genuinely non-resident payee triggers the TDS analysis.

Frequently asked questions

Confirming NRI residential status across client payments? PracticeFlow tracks the documentation for every case.

See it for CA firms

Handling foreign remittances for multiple clients? PracticeFlow tracks every Form 15CA/15CB, TRC expiry and remittance deadline across your firm.

Verified for FY 2026-27 (Income Tax Act 2025, Section 393(2)) · Last reviewed 3 July 2026.

Sources: CBDT notifications, Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. CIT (Supreme Court, 2021). Form numbers used here (15CA, 15CB, 10F, 10FA) are current names — any renumbering under the Income-tax Act 2025 is reported but not independently confirmed.

This is an educational guide, not tax advice — cross-border classification, treaty rates and form names are fact-specific; confirm with a professional before remitting. Report an error →