New: FY 2025-26 compliance calendar is live — view it here

TDS on Payment to a Foreign Freelancer

Payment to a foreign freelancer for design, development, writing, or similar services generally attracts 20% TDS as FTS under Section 393(2), absent DTAA relief.

FY 2026-27 · Section 393(2)

Quick answer

Indicative rate

20%

Section & code

Section 393(2), Sl. No. 17, Code 1057

Forms typically needed:

Form 15CA Form 15CB if above threshold

Cross-Border TDS Decision Helper

Payee has valid PAN?
TRC + Form 41 furnished?

Indicative Act rate

20%

Domestic Act rate under Section 393(2) for royalty/FTS to a non-resident non-company — doubled from 10% by Finance Act 2023 (effective 1 April 2023), unchanged since. Classify carefully: royalty and FTS have different treaty definitions.

Without a TRC and Form 41, the treaty rate can't be applied — the Act rate above governs until documentation is furnished.

This is a decision aid, not a filing determination — always confirm classification and the exact treaty article with a professional before remitting.

Freelance platform payments raise the same questions as any FTS payment

Indian businesses increasingly hire foreign-based freelancers — for software development, graphic design, content writing, or specialized technical work — often through platforms like Upwork or Fiverr, or via direct contracts. These payments are subject to the same Section 393(2) classification analysis as any other foreign services payment: is this FTS, and if so, is a DTAA rate available.

Most freelance services with a technical, managerial, or consultancy character — software development, technical writing, engineering design — squarely qualify as FTS, attracting the 20% domestic rate absent treaty relief. Purely creative or artistic work without a technical/consultancy character (certain design or content work) sits closer to the margin and may warrant more careful individual assessment.

Paying through a freelance platform vs. paying the individual directly

When payment is routed through a platform (Upwork, Fiverr, Toptal) rather than paid directly to the freelancer's own bank account, the Indian business's TDS obligation still generally applies to the underlying payment for the freelancer's services — the platform is typically a payment facilitator, not the actual service provider, so the classification analysis applies to the freelancer relationship, not the platform. In practice, this creates a genuine practical difficulty: platforms often don't readily support the Indian business's compliance needs (providing a TRC for the specific individual freelancer, or supporting Form 15CB documentation), which is one reason many businesses under-comply with TDS on platform-sourced freelance work.

Small, one-off freelance payments still technically trigger the framework

Because Section 393(2) has no minimum threshold, even a modest one-off freelance payment — a ₹15,000 logo design, a ₹25,000 blog-writing project — technically triggers the same classification and (absent an applicable exemption) TDS-deduction obligation as a large consultancy engagement. In practice, very small, ad hoc freelance payments are frequently under-complied with, simply due to the administrative burden being disproportionate to the payment size — but this remains a compliance gap, not a formal exemption, and businesses relying on frequent small foreign freelance payments in aggregate should be aware the obligation technically exists regardless of individual payment size.

A practical approach for businesses hiring foreign freelancers regularly

  • Classify the nature of the freelance work (technical/consultancy vs. purely creative) before assuming FTS treatment applies uniformly.
  • For platform-sourced freelancers, understand that the underlying compliance obligation applies to the freelancer relationship regardless of the platform's own limited documentation support.
  • Track cumulative payments per freelancer across the year against the ₹5 lakh Form 15CB threshold.
  • For businesses with substantial recurring foreign freelance spend, consider building a standard onboarding step requesting TRC/Form 10F from significant freelance relationships upfront.

Worked example

A ₹1.5 lakh website development project paid to a Philippines-based freelancer via Upwork

An Indian startup pays ₹1,50,000 for a website development project to a Philippines-based freelancer sourced via Upwork. This is FTS (technical/development services). Absent DTAA documentation (which would require a TRC and Form 10F from the individual freelancer — often impractical to obtain for a one-off platform engagement), 20% TDS (₹30,000) applies. Form 15CA is filed to support the payment; Form 15CB isn't mandatory below the ₹5 lakh threshold, though the underlying classification and deduction obligation still applies regardless of the modest amount.

Common mistakes & litigation traps

Treating platform-sourced freelance payments as outside the TDS framework entirely

Paying through Upwork, Fiverr, or a similar platform doesn't remove the underlying TDS obligation on the payment for the freelancer's services — it's a payment facilitator, not a reason for exemption.

Ignoring small one-off freelance payments due to their modest size

Section 393(2) has no minimum threshold — even small payments technically trigger the classification and deduction obligation, regardless of administrative convenience.

Assuming all freelance work is automatically FTS

Purely creative/artistic work without a technical or consultancy character can sit outside the FTS definition — assess the specific nature of the work rather than applying FTS uniformly to all freelance categories.

Frequently asked questions

Managing freelancer payment compliance across many client accounts? PracticeFlow keeps every payee organized.

See it for CA firms

Handling foreign remittances for multiple clients? PracticeFlow tracks every Form 15CA/15CB, TRC expiry and remittance deadline across your firm.

Verified for FY 2026-27 (Income Tax Act 2025, Section 393(2)) · Last reviewed 3 July 2026.

Sources: CBDT notifications, Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. CIT (Supreme Court, 2021). Form numbers used here (15CA, 15CB, 10F, 10FA) are current names — any renumbering under the Income-tax Act 2025 is reported but not independently confirmed.

This is an educational guide, not tax advice — cross-border classification, treaty rates and form names are fact-specific; confirm with a professional before remitting. Report an error →