Company Not Filed ROC for 5 Years — Total Exposure
A company unfiled on AOC-4 and MGT-7 for 5 consecutive years faces roughly ₹6,43,200 in accrued penalties, computed from ten separate rows — and its directors have been disqualified under Section 164(2) since the third year of that default.
Forms to check
Per-year AGM date overrides (5)
Not sure?
Select at least one financial year and form above to compute exposure.
ROC Default & Penalty Exposure
Private Limited Company · Generated by PracticeFlow
| FY | Form | Due date | Days late | Penalty |
|---|
Total exposure: ₹0
Verify against the latest MCA notifications and confirm with a qualified CS/CA before relying on this figure. practiceflow.in/tools/roc-penalty-calculator
Five years, ten accruing rows
Five years of unfiled AOC-4 and MGT-7 means ten separate rows — each with its own AGM-relative due date and its own accruing ₹100/day fee — not a single multiplied figure. At today's date this totals roughly ₹6,43,200, with the earliest year's rows having accrued for far longer than the most recent year's.
This is precisely the scenario a single-filing calculator or the MCA portal's own one-form-at-a-time interface cannot represent in one view — a CS reviewing this company's file needs the total across every year at once to understand what's actually owed, not ten separate lookups.
The director consequence has already been triggered — twice over
By the third consecutive year of this default, every director was already disqualified for five years under Section 164(2); by five years, that disqualification has been in effect for two years already, independent of whatever additional fee is eventually paid. Regularising the filings at this point addresses the company's compliance status and the accruing fee, but does not retroactively undo a disqualification that has already run its course from the point it was triggered.
For a prospect conversation, this is the number and the finding that wins the engagement: a CS who can show a director that the exposure is not a vague "you're behind on ROC" but a specific total plus a specific, already-triggered legal consequence has a materially stronger case for the client to act immediately, and to retain ongoing help to make sure it never recurs.
Frequently asked questions
Related pages
Why this matters
A number plus a triggered consequence is what turns a compliance conversation into an engagement — automate the tracking with PracticeFlow.
Related tools
This is what years of missed filings cost. PracticeFlow tracks every client's ROC, GST and TDS deadlines automatically and chases the documents — so this conversation never has to happen again.
See PracticeFlow for CS FirmsEstimate for planning purposes, not legal or compliance advice — always confirm with a CS/CA before relying on any figure or consequence stated here.