New: FY 2025-26 compliance calendar is live — view it here

Income Tax on ₹12.75 Lakh Taxable Income — Where Relief Runs Out

At ₹12,75,000 taxable income, Section 87A marginal relief is already redundant — plain slab tax (₹71,250, ₹74,100 after cess) is lower than the excess-over-₹12,00,000 figure, so the min() rule resolves to the ordinary slab tax.

FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28) · Income-tax Act 2025

Your Details

Old Regime Deductions

Total: ₹0

HRA exemption is not available under the new regime — it only affects the old-regime column.

Comparison

New Regime

Taxable income₹12,75,000
Income tax₹71,250
Rebate u/s 87A₹0
Surcharge₹0
Cess₹2,850
Total payable₹74,100

Old Regime

Taxable income₹12,75,000
Income tax₹1,95,000
Rebate u/s 87A₹0
Surcharge₹0
Cess₹7,800
Total payable₹2,02,800

Recommendation

New regime saves you 0 this year.

The new regime wins here because your old-regime deductions (₹0) are below the ~₹4,81,248 break-even where the old regime starts to pay off.

Client summary

Why marginal relief no longer changes this figure

At ₹12,75,000 taxable income, the excess over ₹12,00,000 is ₹75,000 — but the ordinary slab tax on this income is only ₹71,250, already lower than that excess figure. Since Section 87A caps tax at min(slab tax, excess), and slab tax is now the smaller of the two, the min() resolves to plain slab tax. Relief hasn't been "switched off" — it's simply no longer the binding constraint.

This crossover happens at roughly ₹12,70,588 taxable income under the current slab structure. ₹12,75,000 sits just past that point, so the payable tax here (₹74,100 after 4% cess) is the ordinary slab-rate figure, not a relief-discounted one.

The rule, precisely

Let T be the slab tax on taxable income X, and E = X − ₹12,00,000. Tax payable = min(T, E). At ₹12,75,000 taxable income, T = ₹71,250 and E = ₹75,000, so tax payable is the smaller of the two: ₹71,250. This holds for every taxable income from ₹12,00,001 up to roughly ₹12,70,588, beyond which plain slab tax is already lower than E and the relief becomes redundant on its own.

Applying this correctly matters because the error runs in only one direction — a calculator that skips marginal relief always overstates the tax due in this band, never understates it. For a salaried employee checking whether their employer's TDS calculation is right, or a CA sanity-checking a client's provisional tax, that overstatement is exactly the kind of number that erodes trust once someone works out the correct figure by hand.

Frequently asked questions

Why this matters

Running this comparison for every client, every year, is where advisory value shows up — automate it with PracticeFlow.

Doing this for dozens of clients every season? PracticeFlow automates the whole filing calendar for your firm.

See PracticeFlow for CA Firms

Estimate for planning purposes, not tax advice — always confirm with a CA before filing.

Report an error →